Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
1.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 45(6): 1186-1195, Nov.-Dec. 2019. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1056349

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT Introduction: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of transobturator tape (TOT) on overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms and quality of life. Materials and Methods: Patients with stress-predominant mixed urinary incontinence (MUI) who had undergone TOT procedures were considered candidates for this research. Preoperative assessment included anamnesis, pelvic examination, cough stress test (CST), and validated symptom severity and quality of life (QoL) questionnaires. The primary outcome, improvement and cure rates of OAB symptoms were determined based on the patient's baseline scores in symptom-related questions in OAB-V8. Secondary outcomes included the success rates of SUI, changes in the QoL score and patient satisfaction rates. Results: A total of 104 patients were included in the study. Sixty-two patients underwent TOT placement alone, and 42 patients underwent TOT placement along with prolapse surgery. The mean follow-up period of the patients was 30.47 months range: 13-52 months. At the first-year follow-up, 52 patients (50.0%) and 59 patients (56.7%) reported cure in preoperative urgency and urgency incontinence, respectively. The objective and subjective cure rates were 96.2% and 56.7%, respectively. A total of 80.7% of the cases had a 15-point improvement in QoL scores. Conclusions: MUS is not only a gold standard treatment in SUI but also presents as a promising treatment modality in stress-dominant MUI. Although the improvement rates of OAB symptoms significantly decrease over time, QoL and patient satisfaction rates remain higher than any other treatment in this patient group at the third-year follow-up.


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Adult , Aged , Young Adult , Quality of Life , Urinary Incontinence, Stress/surgery , Urinary Bladder, Overactive/surgery , Urinary Incontinence, Urge/surgery , Suburethral Slings , Postoperative Period , Time Factors , Urinary Incontinence, Stress/physiopathology , Prospective Studies , Surveys and Questionnaires , Analysis of Variance , Follow-Up Studies , Treatment Outcome , Patient Satisfaction , Statistics, Nonparametric , Urinary Bladder, Overactive/physiopathology , Urinary Incontinence, Urge/physiopathology , Preoperative Period , Patient Reported Outcome Measures , Middle Aged
2.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 41(3): 535-541, May-June 2015. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-755876

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACTIntroduction:

Penile prostheses are subject to a continuous development and have gained better mechanical reliability and safety during the last decades. In this study, we aimed to investigate the outcomes and satisfaction rates of inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) and semirigid penile prosthesis (SPP) implantation.

Materials and Methods:

From August 2001 to June 2012, 257 men with erectile dysfunction (ED) underwent penile prosthesis implantation (PPI) at our institution. Of the 257 patients, 118 underwent implantation of IPP and 139 underwent SPP implantation. The pre-operative and post-operative erectile status of the patients were assessed by international index of erectile function (IIEF) questionnaire. The satisfaction of patients and partners were evaluated by a telephone interview using the erectile dysfunction inventory of treatment satisfaction (EDITS) questionnaire and EDITS partner survey.

Results:

The overall major complication rate was higher in IPP group. PPI led to a significant improvement in IIEF scores in both groups. For IPP and SPP groups the average EDITS scores were 78±11and 57±8, respectively, and that for the partners were 72±10 and 49±7, respectively (p<0.05).

Conclusion:

Although the IPP implantation have better satisfaction rates, the SPP implantation is still a viable treatment option in the surgical treatment of ED because of low cost and high durability with acceptable satisfaction rates.

.


Subject(s)
Adult , Aged , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Erectile Dysfunction/surgery , Penile Prosthesis , Patient Satisfaction/statistics & numerical data , Penile Implantation/methods , Erectile Dysfunction/physiopathology , Postoperative Complications , Prosthesis Design , Penile Prosthesis/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Sexual Partners , Statistics, Nonparametric , Surveys and Questionnaires , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL